Tracking work task completion

A support vector machine approach for assisting workbenches

Authors

  • Sascha Niedersteiner OTH Regensburg
  • Jonas Lang OTH Regensburg
  • Clemens Pohlt OTH Regensburg
  • Thomas Schlegl OTH Regensburg

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17560/atp.v59i11.1911

Keywords:

machine learning, assisting workbench, human-machine interaction, 3D depth camera, robust tracking of task completion

Abstract

Tightening quality requirements of industrial products involving manual assembly lead to the development of assisting workbenches with integrated functions to support workers performing these manual tasks. This contribution discusses a new approach to learning transitions of a finite state automaton representing the sequence of work tasks based on the video stream of a 3D depth camera. Preprocessed video data is fed into a three-stage classification scheme based on support vector machines. The results of the classification are then related to the state automation to trigger state transitions indicating the completion of a specific work task and the start of the next one. The proposed approach has been evaluated at an industrial assembly process of moderate complexity and shows very robust results with respect to disturbances caused by inaccurate object classification.

References

David, H. (2015). Why are there still so many jobs? The history and future of workplace automation. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29(3), 3-30.

Frohm, J., Lindström, V., Winroth, M., & Stahre, J. (2006). The industry's view on automation in manufacturing. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 39(4), 453-458

Belfiore, M. (2016). Automation Opportunities Abound for Quality Inspections. Abgerufen von http://www.automationworld.com/quality-software/automation-opportunities-abound-quality-inspections.

Niedersteiner, S., Pohlt, C., & Schlegl, T. (2015, November). Smart workbench: a multimodal and bidirectional assistance system for industrial application. In Industrial Electronics Society, IECON 2015-41st Annual Conference of the IEEE (pp. 002938-002943). IEEE.

Sugi, M., Matsumura, I., Tamura, Y., Ota, J., & Arai, T. (2008, May). Quantitative evaluation of physical assembly support in human supporting production system “attentive workbench”. In Robotics and Automation, 2008. ICRA 2008. IEEE International Conference on (pp. 3624-3629). IEEE.

Sugi, M., Nikaido, M., Tamura, Y., Ota, J., Arai, T., Kotani, K., ... & Sato, Y. (2005, April). Motion control of self-moving trays for human supporting production cell “attentive workbench”. In Robotics and Automation, 2005. ICRA 2005. Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on (pp. 4080-4085). IEEE.

Sugi, M., Tamura, Y., Ota, J., Arai, T., Takamasu, K., & Suzuki, H. (2006, October). Implementation of Human Supporting Production System" AttentiveWorkbench". In Sice-icase, 2006. international joint conference (pp. 1270-1273). IEEE.

Molineros, J., & Sharma, R. (2001). Computer vision for guiding manual assembly. In Assembly and Task Planning, 2001, Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on (pp. 362-368). IEEE.

Bansal, S., Khandelwal, S., Gupta, S., & Goyal, D. (2013, September). Kitchen activity recognition based on scene context. In Image Processing (ICIP), 2013 20th IEEE International Conference on (pp. 3461-3465). IEEE.

Jauch, V. (2012). Positionserkennung von Werkzeugen in der Montage. In: ATZproduktion, 2012(02). Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien GmbH

OPS Solutions LLC. (2016). Light Guide Systems – Leading the Revolution in Manufacturing Light Guide System. Abgerufen von: http://www.ops-solutions.com/.

Bedrunka+Hirth GmbH (2017). Arbeitsplatz 4.0. – montieren/kommissionieren/kontrollieren. Abgerufen von http://www.bedrunka-hirth.de/produkte/arbeitsplatzsysteme/arbeitsplatz-40/

Lowe, D. G. (1999). Object recognition from local scale-invariant features. In Computer vision, 1999. The proceedings of the seventh IEEE international conference on (Vol. 2, pp. 1150-1157). IEEE.

Bay, H., Ess, A., Tuytelaars T., van Gool, L. (2008). Speeded-Up Robust Features (SURF). In: Computer Vision and Multimedia, 110. Jg., Nr. 3, S. 346–359.

Rublee, E., Rabaud, V., Konolige, K., & Bradski, G. (2011, November). ORB: An efficient alternative to SIFT or SURF. In Computer Vision (ICCV), 2011 IEEE international conference on (pp. 2564-2571). IEEE.

Leutenegger, S., Chli, M., & Siegwart, R. Y. (2011, November). BRISK: Binary robust invariant scalable keypoints. In Computer Vision (ICCV), 2011 IEEE International Conference on (pp. 2548-2555). IEEE.

Schölkopf, B., Williamson, R. C., Smola, A. J., Shawe-Taylor, J., & Platt, J. C. (2000). Support vector method for novelty detection. In Advances in neural information processing systems (pp. 582-588).

Cortes, C., Vapnik V. (1995). Support-Vector Networks. In: Machine Learning, vol. 20(3), S. 273–297. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022627411411

Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel, O., ... & Vanderplas, J. (2011). Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12(Oct), 2825-2830.

Published

2017-11-17